Akdede, N.; Ay, B. Ö and Dino, İ G. (2026) Rethinking the second life of post-disaster and post-conflict temporary housing. Buildings & Cities, 7(1), pp. 488-503. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
Providing temporary housing (TH) units after natural hazards and social conflicts is often an urgent necessity. Beyond their initial configuration, the second life of these units is crucial, given their temporary nature. Despite growing interest in second-life strategies, many TH units and associated infrastructure remain unused or inefficiently managed after their initial deployment. Second-life strategies are presented for post-disaster and post-conflict (PDPC) TH units and settlements in Türkiye, using two case studies—the 2011 Van earthquakes and Syrians under temporary protection—and expert insights from the Disaster and Emergency Management Presidency of Türkiye (Afet ve Acil Durum Yönetimi Başkanlığı—AFAD). A three-step methodology was employed, including a literature review, semi-structured expert interviews and hybrid deductive–inductive thematic analysis. Findings reveal that second-life outcomes are largely shaped by policy gaps, operational conditions, tenure constraints, institutional decisions and user practices rather than by design-based circular approaches. The proposed framework provides practical guidance for policymakers and practitioners in Türkiye and other crisis-prone contexts to improve resource efficiency and integrate second-life planning into preparedness and recovery processes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | disaster management; disaster recovery; post-disaster reconstruction; reuse; second life; temporary housing; temporary shelter; Türkiye |
| Index terms: | methodology, practitioner, thematic analysis, temporary shelter, configuration, emergency management, temporary housing, interview, second life, strategy, literature review, disaster recovery, natural hazard, earthquake, resource efficiency, post-disaster reconstruction, disaster management, tenure, recovery, case study |
| Subjects: | environmental hazards, financial risk, research methods, specific urban areas and projects, digital technology, operations management, practitioner, construction type, systems engineering, emergency and crisis management, methods and analysis, management, post-disaster and reconstruction, data analysis and analytics, real estate economics, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Urban Studies, Digital Applications, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here