Warren-Myers, G and McRae, E (2017) Volume home building: The provision of sustainability information for new homebuyers. Construction Economics and Building, 17(2), pp. 24-40. ISSN 2204-9029
Abstract
The new residential housing sector is producing approximately 200,000 homes a year that could benefit from methods to increase sustainability and energy efficiency. Currently, there is limited implementation of sustainability measures beyond mandatory minimum requirements in Australia. New homebuyers are often the scapegoats for the poor sustainability adoption due to their perceived lack of interest and willingness to pay. However, their knowledge and engagement in sustainability is likely to be strongly guided by information provided by the volume builders. This paper investigates the sustainability information that homebuyers are provided by builders, as communicated through their websites. Web searching as an important means of information gathering in the preliminary stages of the process for new homebuyers. This paper reports on the analysis of Australia’s Home Industry Association’s top 100 volume builders' websites and their provision of sustainability information. The results suggest the lack of sustainability-related information provided by builders is contributing to disengagement by consumers in the sustainability features available in new homes.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | residential construction; consumers; energy efficient housing; sustainability; volume builders |
| Index terms: | housing, builder, residential housing, Australia, implementation, home building, residential construction, willingness to pay, energy efficiency |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, price determination, sustainability and energy, Geography, practitioner, construction type, construction integration |
| Topics: | Procurement, Construction Technology, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here