Alhaddad, H. and Galal Ahmed, K. (2026) Informal household-practiced urban agriculture as a contributor to sustainability and resilience: The case of emirati neighbourhoods. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(3), pp. 1085-1114. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose – While urban farming is advocated as a contributor to urban sustainability and resilience, the "informal" household-practiced urban agriculture activities are taking place within urban spaces in most Emirati neighbourhoods but unfortunately without investigating their potential as participatory processes that could efficiently help attain urban sustainability and resilience on the neighbourhood level. So, this research is a humble attempt to bridge the gap of the lack of official recognition of informal residents-led processes and their products in a way that help understand them and their impacts and to explore the possibility of developing them further into wider community shared urban agriculture activities. Design/methodology/approach – The research adopted the case study method and selected a representative neighbourhood to investigate informal residents-led urban agriculture practices. The utilized qualitative–quantitative investigation tools included map analysis, field observation and in-depth interviews with the residents of the selected neighbourhood. Findings – The results of the research have revealed that the residents managed to successfully pursue informal urban farming processes that have led to significant environmental, social and economic sustainability and resilience outcomes. While these informal urban farming activities are performed individually by each household, the interviewed residents have shown enthusiasm to take part in larger-scale collective community urban farming activities, especially in the deserted public and semi-public spaces in their neighbourhood. Originality/value – The research outcomes significantly contribute to the growing worldwide discourse about urban agriculture/farming, especially in a country like the UAE where such activities are almost overlooked. Based on its findings, the research concludes by proposing a set of recommended actions to legitimatize these informal urban agriculture processes in the urban development regulations and to build on them to encourage the local communities towards more collective urban farming activities.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | community participation; housing; neighbourhood; UAE; urban agriculture; urban farming; urban resilience; urban sustainability |
| Index terms: | urban development, investigation, economic sustainability, household, case study, housing, urban resilience, regulation, methodology, public space, urban space, community participation, interview |
| Subjects: | urban design, urban design and public space, research methods, demography, construction type, economic analysis, political science, data collection methods, participation process, sustainability and resilience |
| Topics: | Urban Studies, Construction Technology, Governance, Stakeholder Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here