A novel framework for sustainable contracting process in organisational public procurement

Alsamarraie, M. M. and Mohd Ghazali, F. E. (2026) A novel framework for sustainable contracting process in organisational public procurement. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(8), pp. 1653-1668. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

The procurement system suffered from disintegration and corrupt practices. This study responded to the Government of Iraq (GoI) and other local and international reports concerning the lack of harmonisation and process modernisation. Therefore, the study aimed to integrate contracting activities by introducing a framework for contracting practice and team collaboration. It included mixed methods, and it collected questionnaire surveys of 378 respondents from organisations in the public sector. The authors used a Delphi method and extended the study by interviewing eight experts for the validation process. The findings uncovered the weakness in applying coherent frameworks in the public sector and emphasised the viability of embedding the Integrative Procurement Stage (IPS) in the procurement process. Data analysis revealed that the framework has the potential to improve prevalent issues, such as cost reduction (CR), Ethical Issues (EI), Project Risk (PR), and Team Collaboration (TC). Moreover, experts encouraged restructuring the procurement system and introducing IPS to obtain several advantages, such as procurement transparency and consistency, project integrity and productivity, sharing knowledge, effective contractor participation, combating corruption, and achieving Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs).

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: contracting; framework; public procurement; sustainable process
Index terms: corruption, questionnaire, validation, cost reduction, procurement process, team collaboration, data analysis, sustainable process, survey, sustainable development goal, procurement system, disintegration, transparency, Delphi method, mixed method, productivity, integrity, public sector
Subjects: data collection methods, material degradation and durability, data analysis and analytics, professional development, economics, management, administrative law, contractual arrangements, health safety and environment, sustainable design, collaborative management, professional ethics
Topics: Legal Issues, Health and Safety, Project Management, Sustainability, Procurement, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here