Alshboul, O. and Shehadeh, A. (2026) Enhancing infrastructure project outcomes through optimized contractual structures and long-term warranties. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(3), pp. 2220-2242. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – This study delves into the influence of contractual frameworks on infrastructure project timelines and evaluates the role of long-term warranty agreements in maintenance efficacy. It underscores the correlation between construction contract structures and prevalent project delays, advocating for a revision in the allocation of responsibilities to mitigate such delays effectively. Design/methodology/approach – While previous research has explored individual aspects of construction management, such as contractor incentives and risk allocation, our study uniquely integrates these elements to develop a comprehensive model that includes the effects of long-term warranty agreements and penalty clauses. Findings – The findings advocate for contract revisions that entail clearly articulated responsibilities and thorough impact assessments, aimed at enhancing the efficiency of project execution and optimizing infrastructure investment returns. Concrete examples are provided from large-scale infrastructure and public works maintenance projects, illustrating the benefits of well-defined penalty clauses in curbing delays and ensuring sustained quality through long-term warranties. Our results demonstrate that optimized contractual structures can significantly reduce project delays and enhance maintenance effectiveness. Originality/value – This study addresses significant gaps in understanding construction contract management dynamics, especially in transportation infrastructure. It rigorously analyzes how penalty clauses and long-term warranties impact contractor behavior and project outcomes. Key findings show that the benefits of long-term warranties, including social advantages, depend heavily on the strictness of penalty clauses. Innovatively, it employs a First-Price Sealed-Bid Auction framework with empirical data from various case studies, enhancing contract structure optimization for better stakeholder alignment and infrastructure integrity. These insights notably advance construction contract management methodologies.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractual structures; infrastructure maintenance; infrastructure project delays; long-term warranties; penalty clauses |
| Index terms: | risk allocation, effectiveness, construction contract, public work, warranty, transportation infrastructure, dynamics, agreements, infrastructure project, case study, efficiency, contract structure, project outcome, infrastructure investment, integrity, impact assessment, methodology, project delay, penalty |
| Subjects: | project completion, contract type, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, financial risk, infrastructure engineering, health safety and environment, research methods, value management, data collection methods, contract formation, performance management, performance measurement, systems engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, regulatory law, project controls |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Quality Management, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Procurement, Time Control, Contract Administration, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here