Alves, J. L.; Almeida Filho, A. T. D.; Bradaschia, F. and Palha, R. P. (2026) Solarisbim.AI: Smart sustainable building planning with BIM-based solar-production estimation using machine-learning radiation forecasts. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(6): 04026076, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Urban expansion, driven by economic and technological development, has intensified building construction and increased energy demand. Over the last decade, this trend has become a global challenge due to the depletion of fossil fuel reserves and the environmental impacts associated with greenhouse gas emissions. As a result, integrating renewable energy sources has become essential for achieving sustainable development goals. Among the available alternatives, photovoltaic energy stands out as a solution to meet the growing energy demand in buildings. In this context, this study presents SolarisBIM.AI, a framework that integrates machine learning-based solar radiation forecasting with a Dynamo routine within a Building Information Modeling (BIM) environment to quantify solar energy produced and CO2 avoided. Three predictive approaches were tested: extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), long short-Term memory networks (LSTMs), and feedforward neural networks (FNNs). Using a 49-year historical solar radiation series from six cities in Pernambuco, Brazil, the FNN achieved the best performance. In a real case study, SolarisBIM.AI predicted an annual solar energy production of 381,802 kWh for 2023, only a 2% overestimation compared with the measured production of 374,204 kWh at the center for technology and geosciences (CTG) UFPE building. This close agreement reinforces the model's suitability for early-stage design assessments and decision-making in building energy planning. These results demonstrate that the proposed approach can support architects, engineers, and planners in quantifying solar energy production and assessing building sustainability at the design stage.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | artificial intelligence; building information modeling; efficiency; solar energy; sustainability |
| Index terms: | efficiency, building information modelling, case study, energy demand, forecasting, engineer, solar radiation, estimation, depletion, building sustainability, architect, fossil fuel, sustainable development goal, planner, photovoltaic, artificial intelligence, solar energy, routine, building construction, feedforward, neural network, Brazil, decision-making, sustainable building, greenhouse gas emission, environmental impact, design stage, machine learning, suitability, renewable energy source |
| Subjects: | building construction, sustainable construction, Geography, sustainable design, environmental resource management, professional practice, environmental impact, decision analysis, sociology, information systems, environmental health, design criteria, performance management, sustainability and energy, prediction and forecasting, financial and cost management, energy systems, artificial intelligence, profession, data collection methods, control systems |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here