Anbar, D. R.; Deng, X.; Taha Alqershy, M. and Ullah, S. (2026) Unveiling interpersonal distrust as a mediator between contingent employees and knowledge hiding in international construction projects in the gulf region. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(7), pp. 1390-1405. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
This study explores the dynamics of knowledge hiding (KH) within international construction projects (ICPs) in the Gulf region, with a focus on the influence of contingent employees (CEs) and interpersonal distrust (ID). It aims to understand how these factors influence KH and explore the mediating effect of ID on the relationship between CEs and KH. Through a survey distributed to ICP participants in the Gulf region, which yielded 157 complete responses, we applied structural equation modelling to test the research hypotheses. The results show the both significant influence of CEs and ID on KH, along with the partial mediating effect of ID on the CEs-KH relationship. While this study highlights the complex dynamics of KH in ICPs in the Gulf region, it also open avenues for future research to explore the influence of other contextual factors and organisational structures. This research are providing actionable insights for creating a transparent and inclusive culture of knowledge sharing (KS) in multicultural project teams, thereby enhancing project outcomes and organisational success. This study emphasises the importance of open communication, diverse team structures, and mentoring initiatives as critical to reducing KH and enhancing project collaboration, thus contributing to the overall success of ICPs.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contingent employees; gulf countries; international construction projects; interpersonal distrust; knowledge hiding |
| Index terms: | survey, dynamics, structural equation modelling, project team, project outcome, organizational structure, mediator, knowledge sharing, mentoring, collaboration, international construction project |
| Subjects: | training, project delivery, management, statistical analysis, systems engineering, sociology, strategic management, project completion, knowledge management, data collection methods, dispute resolution |
| Topics: | Project Management, Human Resources, International Construction, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Legal Issues, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here