Chen, S.; Guan, Z.; Zhang, Z.; Guo, H. and Han, Y. (2026) Impact of construction workers' physical fatigue on unsafe behavior: An ecg-based field experiment study. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(8): 04026128, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Physical fatigue is a major factor contributing to construction safety incidents, as it significantly increases the probability of workers' unsafe behavior. To better understand the impact of physical fatigue on unsafe behavior, this research conducted a field experiment employing real-time electrocardiogram (ECG) data to evaluate workers' physical fatigue levels. Three workers were recruited to perform material handling tasks in a controlled basement environment. Over a three-day experiment, workers' ECG signals and unsafe behaviors were continuously monitored. Finally, 42 valid samples were collected and analyzed. The results show a rising trend in unsafe behavior after 30 minutes of physically demanding tasks, with a notable increase as physical fatigue accumulates. Moreover, significant variations were observed in both time-domain and frequency-domain ECG indexes, including R-R interval (RR), standard deviation of NN intervals (SDNN), root mean square of successive differences (rMSSD), total power (TP), high-frequency power (HF), and ratio of low-frequency power to high-frequency power (LF/HF). Specifically, unsafe behavior is negatively correlated with RR, SDNN, and HF, but positively correlated with rMSSD and TP. TP shows the strongest association with unsafe behavior among the ECG indexes. These findings contribute to construction workers' occupational health and safety and offer valuable insights for further research on workers' fatigue based on physiological metrics.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction workers; electrocardiogram; physical fatigue; safety management; unsafe behavior |
| Index terms: | occupational health and safety, fatigue, experiment, unsafe behaviour, material handling, safety management, construction safety, variation, deviation, construction worker |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, financial and cost management, contractual condition, occupational health and safety management, health conditions and diseases, environmental health, practitioner, product delivery, financial risk |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Research Practice, Contract Administration, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Supply Chain Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here