Upstill-Goddard, J; Glass, J; Dainty, A and Nicholson, I (2015) Developing a sustainability assessment tool to aid organisational learning in construction SMEs. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 31st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2015, Lincoln, UK.
Abstract
Organisations engage with sustainability for a number of reasons, often implementing standards to demonstrate commitment to sustainability or benchmark performance. However, many scholars discuss sustainability from an operational or administrative perspective, largely neglecting the role of individuals making up the organisation. Central to organisational development are the learning processes of these individuals and how these translate into organisational learning. Although research into organisational learning is abundant, relatively little is known about how construction organisations, particularly those classified as SMEs, undergo learning processes in order to increase their knowledge. Furthermore, organisational learning requires high absorptive capacities (ACAP) and previous research has linked this with successful standard implementation. SMEs are often pressurised by customers to obtain certification to multiple standards, yet often lack the necessary expertise, and financial and time resources to implement these. This research argues that organisational learning is a key limiting factor in successful sustainability standard implementation. Specifically, the development phase of a sustainability self-assessment tool to identify environmental and social aspects most relevant to an organisation's operations is presented. Following this, the tool then enables the level of organisational knowledge held about each of these aspects to be determined such that learning approaches are informed to increase learning and knowledge and hence absorptive capacities. The main components of this assessment tool are presented and rules for its operation and development established. Next steps for the assessment framework and suggestions for its applicability to construction product manufacturers are also offered.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | absorptive capacity; corporate social responsibility; organisational learning; sustainability assessment; sustainability standards |
| Index terms: | benchmark performance, manufacturer, construction product, commitment, absorptive capacity, construction organization, certification, implementation, organizational development, social aspect, corporate social responsibility, sustainability standard, organizational learning, sustainability assessment |
| Subjects: | business, theoretical framing, sociology, psychology, sustainability assessment, practitioner, organization, performance measurement, professional development, health safety and environment, contractual arrangements, administrative processes, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Quality Management, Contract Administration, Business Strategy, Procurement, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Sustainability, Information Management, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here