Managing risks under nuclear power plant projects: A latent similarity-guided contract customization

Elazhary, M. and El-Adaway, I. H. (2026) Managing risks under nuclear power plant projects: A latent similarity-guided contract customization. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(7): 04026089, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Global energy is transforming, with nuclear power emerging as a pivotal player in achieving sustainable and low-carbon energy goals. The nature of nuclear technology introduces unique challenges, such as stringent safety and environmental requirements. Existing studies focus on general risk identification, such as supply chain delays, cost overruns, and public perception issues. However, these studies fail to address integrating these risks into tailored contractual provisions, which are critical for navigating the unique challenges of nuclear projects. The goal of this paper is to examine how standard construction contracts can be tailored to better accommodate the risks inherent in nuclear power plant construction. This study employs a multistep methodology. It begins with a comprehensive literature review using the Scopus search engine to identify construction management risks and associated keywords specific to nuclear projects. These risks are analyzed using latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) to objectively identify relevant clauses within a standard construction contract. By leveraging associated keywords, LDA determines whether the identified risks are adequately addressed in the contractual clauses. Cosine similarity is then used to measure the alignment between the risks and the extracted clauses. Finally, the study integrates industry experience by reviewing nuclear-specific guidelines, reports, and lessons learned to address risks not sufficiently covered in standard contracts and then validating the integration through industry experts. Results showed that the most neglected risk under the standard contract was stakeholder relations and cultural differences. It was recommended to include stakeholder mapping exercises, appoint dedicated cultural mediators, and establish multilingual communication protocols to bridge language barriers and mitigate cultural misunderstandings in nuclear projects. By systematically analyzing risks and aligning them with contractual provisions, this research provides a framework for improving risk management in high-stakes nuclear construction. The findings highlight the necessity of adapting standard contracts to address nuclear-specific challenges.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: cost overrun, mediator, customization, management risk, exercise, construction contract, risk management, cultural difference, literature review, risk identification, nuclear power, lessons learned, methodology, integration, mapping
Subjects: construction manufacturing, contract type, health behaviours and lifestyles, cross-cultural studies, spatial and geospatial analysis, research methods, financial risk, financial and cost management, energy systems, data analysis and analytics, risk assessment, dispute resolution, organizational analysis, professional development
Topics: Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, International Construction, Risk Management, Procurement, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here