Towards promoting circular building adaptability in adaptive reuse projects: A co-developed framework

Hamida, M. B.; Remøy, H.; Gruis, V. and van Laar, B. (2026) Towards promoting circular building adaptability in adaptive reuse projects: A co-developed framework. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(3), pp. 1313-1340. ISSN 2046-6099

Abstract

Purpose – Circular building adaptability (CBA) in adaptive reuse – building transformation – projects can facilitate a resource-efficient and futureproof redevelopment of the built environment. However, there has been a lack of practical tools that guide practitioners on how to foster CBA in adaptive reuse. Therefore, this study aims to collaboratively develop a guiding framework for CBA in adaptive reuse (CBA-AR) projects in general. The CBA-AR framework is a descriptive and content-oriented synthesis mapping a series of strategies to the CBA determinants alongside their enablers and inhibitors. Design/methodology/approach – A participatory research-oriented approach was followed. First, an archival research was conducted to develop the CBA-AR framework based on literature review and case studies. Second, two co-creation workshops, triangulated with structured interviews, were conducted to validate and expand the framework. Findings – The first version of the CBA-AR framework comprises 30 CBA strategies. It also brings seven enablers and six inhibitors together with the 30 CBA strategies. The outcomes of the participatory approach contributed to refining and expanding the framework. The final of the CBA-AR framework version comprises CBA 33 strategies. This version brings 10 enablers and 7 inhibitors together with the 33 strategies. Practical implications – This framework can be used as a guiding and reporting instrument by designers and property developers while transforming vacant or obsolete properties in the Netherlands. Policy makers can refer to this framework and amend adaptive reuse legislation. Originality/value – The CBA-AR framework can introduce a transformative change in theory and practice, as it is based on theoretical, empirical and participatory research.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: adaptability; adaptive reuse; built environment; circularity; co-creation; participatory research
Index terms: determinant, co-creation, built environment, designer, transformation, circularity, adaptive reuse, archival research, workshop, case study, building adaptability, redevelopment, adaptability, practitioner, mapping, methodology, strategy, literature review, Netherlands, participatory approach, legislation, interview
Subjects: management, infrastructure and transport systems, data collection methods, profession, risk assessment, business, research design and methodology, data analysis and analytics, research methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, sustainable design, Geography, design process, building performance, construction type, user focus, sustainable materials, practitioner, legal systems
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Geographical Context, Risk Management, Sustainability, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here