A unified ontology framework for cross-domain integration of BIM, IoT, and maintenance services in smart facility management

Hosseini, A.; Niknam, M.; Shafaat, A. and Fathi, A. (2026) A unified ontology framework for cross-domain integration of BIM, IoT, and maintenance services in smart facility management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(3), pp. 1784-1812. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – Despite advances in building information modeling (BIM)–Internet of Things (IoT) integration, existing facility management workflows remain fragmented because no ontology framework currently unifies building models, IoT telemetry, manufacturer specifications and maintenance service data into a coherent structure. This semantic gap creates critical inefficiencies, decision bottlenecks and significant operational costs. To address this, the study develops and validates a unified semantic framework designed to replace disconnected, manual workflows with an automated, queryable and machine-interpretable knowledge infrastructure. Design/methodology/approach – The study introduces a modular "hub-and-spoke" semantic architecture developed using the NeOn methodology. It comprises five domain-specific ontologies (BIMSO (core), Product Manufacturer Data Ontology (BIMMO), Internet of Things Ontology (IOTO), Facility Management and Maintenance Ontology (FMMO) and Maintenance Service Provider Ontology (MSPO)) interconnected via a shared upper ontology aligned with the UNIFORMAT II classification. The framework was validated on a real-world elevator system (ELEVATOR-EL001) in the Persian Gulf Complex. Competency questions were formalized as SPARQL queries and executed using Apache Jena Fuseki to assess semantic coherence, retrieval accuracy and time efficiency. Findings – The framework's efficacy was validated on a real-world elevator system in a large-scale commercial complex. Cross-domain information retrieval tasks that took expert personnel 88–97 minutes to complete manually were successfully executed in under 2.2 minutes using the ontology, representing a time reduction of approximately 98% (over 40x faster). A paired t-test confirmed this gain is statistically significant (p < 0.001), with all query results verified for accuracy and semantic coherence. Beyond efficiency, the findings demonstrate the practical potential of unified ontologies to serve as the semantic backbone for scalable digital twin (DT), ultimately reducing operational risk and enabling real-time facility intelligence in complex building environments. Practical implications – The framework reduces manual data aggregation efforts, improves maintenance response times and supports data-driven lifecycle management. Facility managers can leverage integrated insights for cost savings and operational efficiency. Originality/value – This work presents a holistic, four-pillar integration model (unifying asset, operational, procedural and service knowledge) that, to the best of the authors' knowledge, for the first time, formally integrates manufacturer specifications and maintenance service contracts with BIM and IoT data into a single knowledge graph. By moving beyond the limited pairwise integrations of prior research, this approach provides a reusable and scalable foundation for creating intelligent digital twins and data-driven facility operations.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modeling; digital twin; facility management; internet of things; knowledge graph; operation & maintenance management; semantic interoperability
Index terms: digital twin, workflow, coherence, time efficiency, methodology, time reduction, integration, accuracy, ontology, specification, manager, personnel, manufacturer, information retrieval, interoperability, internet, cost saving, lifecycle, efficiency, maintenance management, building information modelling
Subjects: digital engineering, human factors and perception, practitioner, research methods, maintenance engineering, project delivery, computing systems, organizational analysis, data management, systems and processes, information systems, management, education and knowledge transfer, performance management, economics, contractual condition, professional development
Topics: Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Human Resources, Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Project Management, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here