Impact of glazed balcony design on daylight in Finnish apartments

Jegard, L.; Castaño-Rosa, R. and Pelsmakers, S. (2026) Impact of glazed balcony design on daylight in Finnish apartments. Buildings & Cities, 7(1), pp. 576-596. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

Sustainable dwellings should prioritise designs that prevent early obsolescence by supporting occupant needs, their comfort and wellbeing. This includes the provision of good indoor environmental quality and adequate and usable private spaces, including balconies. Yet, visual comfort is still overlooked, specifically in Finland, with its added balcony glazing, its northern position and Nordic climate. This study examines how different glazed balcony designs affect daylight in Finnish apartments. It explores how orientation and geographical location affect daylight performance seasonally considering balcony depth. The research methods include: (1) in-situ daylight factor measurements supplemented with observations and residents' interviews in 10 Finnish case studies; and (2) seasonal assessment of daylight availability and visual comfort using parametric simulations of a selected case study in four orientations, three geographical locations and with three balcony depths. Findings reveal that while balcony depth directly impacted daylight availability, balcony glazing had little effect unless daylight was already scarce. Good daylight generally occurred only in shallow-plan layouts with dual orientation, or when unobstructed by a balcony. Minimising room depth can compensate for the daylight-reducing impact of the balcony. A balance of daylight access, privacy and solar overexposure is needed. PRACTICE RELEVANCE New insights from this study offer guidance for better balcony and apartment design. Key recommendations include the following: (1) Optimise balcony and room depth to maintain daylight access. In single-aspect designs without additional windows, balcony depth should be reduced to compensate for the daylight-reducing impact of the balcony. (2) Balcony design should be adapted to geographical locations, e.g. in highlatitude regions such as Finland, shading from balconies offers limited benefit due to the low solar angle, hence other strategies should be prioritised to mitigate summer solar overexposure. (3) Daylight considerations should be integrated with spatial planning, prioritising daylight-sensitive spaces such as kitchens while ensuring privacy for spaces such as bedrooms. Daylight metrics need integration with user feedback for holistic design decisions. Although the findings cannot be generalised based on a single tool, the authors suggest further development of simulation tools to better address the impacts of glazed balconies.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: balconies; daylight; Finland; glazing; housing; sustainability
Index terms: daylight factor, glazing, Finland, prioritizing, case study, spatial planning, visual comfort, indoor environmental quality, obsolescence, summer, comfort, in-situ, strategy, interview, design decision, housing, bedroom, simulation tool, shading, privacy, integration, well-being, window
Subjects: construction type, climate science, analytical methods, architectural elements, Geography, urban design, asset management, building performance, building construction, professional ethics, data collection methods, mental health and wellbeing, building design, management, design practice, occupational health and safety management, organizational analysis, decision analysis, environmental engineering, environmental health
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Geographical Context, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Sustainability, Risk Management, Legal Issues
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here