Dynamics and influences analysis of public concerns in mega construction projects: An integrated topic and sentiment modeling approach

Jin, S. (2026) Dynamics and influences analysis of public concerns in mega construction projects: An integrated topic and sentiment modeling approach. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(8): 04026104, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Mega construction projects (MCPs) are often subject to complex and evolving public concerns, with both thematic focus and sentiment attitudes evolving continuously throughout the project lifecycle. This study proposes an integrated topic and sentiment modeling approach to uncover the evolutionary patterns of public concerns and their emotional fluctuations. First, a continuous-time dynamic topic model (cDTM) is developed to extract and track key topics of public concern from unstructured textual data over time. Second, the performance of shallow learning, deep learning, and large language models is systematically compared for sentiment analysis, with the optimal model selected to quantify public sentiment at different phases. Third, a topic-sentiment coupling model is constructed to comprehensively evaluate the critical factors driving public attention and emotional trends, and propose targeted public opinion management strategies. Using a real-world MCP as a case study, the study analyzes 1,163 pieces of textual records and reveals clear phase-specific shifts in public concerns as the project progresses. While public sentiment is generally positive, a notable increase in negative emotions is observed during the construction, expansion, and operational transition phases. The proposed integrated modeling framework provides a scientific basis for public opinion management, stakeholder engagement, and the promotion of sustainable development in MCPs.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: sustainable development, large language model, construction project, coupling, deep learning, critical factor, project lifecycle, case study, promotion, management strategy, modelling, stakeholder engagement, dynamics
Subjects: systems engineering, management, data science, artificial intelligence, data collection methods, risk assessment, community and social dimensions, production management, health safety and environment, analytical methods, project completion
Topics: Human Resources, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Health and Safety, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here