Karamoozian, M. and Zhang, H. (2026) Pushing the boundaries of prefabricated shell building design with building information modeling (BIM) and ultra-high performance concrete (uhpc). Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(3), pp. 2564-2585. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – This study explores the revolutionary potential of merging building information modeling (BIM) and ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) in prefabricated shell building design, aiming to redefine the architectural landscape. Design/methodology/approach – The study employs a mixed-methods approach, combining quantitative analysis of structural performance data with qualitative case studies of real-world applications. Specific methods include finite element analysis (FEA) for assessing structural integrity and interviews with industry experts to gather insights on practical implementation. Findings – The integration of BIM and UHPC enables the design of structures that are efficient, sustainable and architecturally innovative. Key findings include improved load-bearing capacity, reduced material usage and enhanced design flexibility. Research limitations/implications – The study focuses on technical aspects, with limited exploration of economic or regulatory factors. Future research could address these areas to provide a more comprehensive understanding. Practical implications – The findings offer valuable insights for architects, engineers and construction professionals, demonstrating how BIM and UHPC can enhance the efficiency, sustainability and aesthetic appeal of prefabricated shell building designs. Social implications – The adoption of BIM and UHPC in prefabricated shell building design promotes the creation of robust and eco-friendly built environments, contributing to societal well-being through enhanced sustainability and reduced carbon footprints. Originality/value – This study provides a novel perspective on the synergistic use of BIM and UHPC, offering justifications through empirical data and expert testimonials that highlight the unique advantages of this integration in modern construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; innovation; prefabricated shell building design; sustainability; ultra-high performance concrete |
| Index terms: | implementation, finite element analysis, construction professional, architect, built environment, high-performance concrete, engineer, aesthetic, integrity, efficiency, building design, building information modelling, carbon footprint, case study, quantitative analysis, boundaries, integration, well-being, exploration, methodology, interview |
| Subjects: | mental health and wellbeing, data collection methods, profession, data analysis and analytics, performance management, professional development, organizational analysis, information systems, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental impact, materials science, environmental resource management, architectural design, contractual arrangements, property law, research methods, factor and component analysis, health safety and environment, engineering analysis |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Legal Issues, Sustainability, Procurement, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here