Streamlining BIM coordination and clash resolution through risk and relevance analysis

Koo, H. J.; Guerra, B. C.; Saka, S. and Leite, F. (2026) Streamlining BIM coordination and clash resolution through risk and relevance analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(7): 04026092, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

As construction projects become more complex, effective model coordination and clash resolution processes are critical for project success. Whereas clash detection is highly automated in existing software to identify conflicts between disciplines in building information models (BIM), review and resolution of these clashes remain primarily manual and, hence, labor-intensive. Despite previous research exploring various technologies and artificial intelligence to support this process, gaps remain. Specifically, no study aims to streamline the clash analysis and support resolution process in a manner that aligns with how BIM experts operate in real-world projects. In this study, a three-step framework is proposed to streamline BIM coordination through enhanced clash analysis and resolution. Multiple predictive machine learning algorithms were applied to validate the framework using real-world clash data. For clash relevance prediction, models such as artificial neural network (ANN) and support vector machine (SVM) achieved more than 80% accuracy and weighted F1 score, with precision up to 88%. For clash risk level prediction, random forest and gradient boosting reached up to 70% accuracy, whereas ANN offered the best balance between precision and recall. This study advances the field of BIM coordination and clash management by introducing a novel framework that integrates with real-world design processes, and by demonstrating how machine learning algorithms can achieve high accuracy in predicting clash relevance and risk level. Additionally, this study provides practical contributions to industry practitioners, by demonstrating a methodology to contextualize clash data and streamline model coordination by filtering out unnecessary work.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: building information modeling; building information modeling (BIM) coordination; clash resolution; clash risk management; machine learning
Index terms: practitioner, construction project, methodology, machine learning, design process, forest, artificial neural network, accuracy, risk management, coordination, artificial intelligence, resolution, project success, building information modelling, streamlining
Subjects: production management, research methods, environmental science, practitioner, information systems, conflict resolution, professional development, project management theory and practice, management, artificial intelligence, modelling and simulation, design methods, risk assessment
Topics: Project Management, Risk Management, Sustainability, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here