Collaborative architecture, engineering, construction, and operations (aeco) practice model for healthcare facilities in Thailand

Laovisutthichai, V.; Viryasiri, T.; Low, S. P.; Sangnin, K.; Kramomtong, W. and Panjapiyakul, N. (2026) Collaborative architecture, engineering, construction, and operations (aeco) practice model for healthcare facilities in Thailand. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(7), pp. 1170-1190. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Collaborative practices in architecture, engineering, construction, and operations (AECO) are essential for delivering greener, safer, and higher-quality healthcare facilities. While its execution requires shared knowledge, perspectives, and values among key stakeholders, a joint forum to facilitate the seamless exchange of insights is somehow lacking. This research, therefore, aims to gather multistakeholder reflections and refine the AECO practice model for healthcare facilities. It employed a qualitative methodology, based on insights from eight public stakeholder forums held in Bangkok and subsequent thematic analysis. These forums brought together designers, construction managers, contractors, and facility managers to reflect on their professional experiences. The findings propose refinements to the AECO practice model by highlighting discipline-specific role adaptations across the facility lifecycle. For example, architects are repositioned as active collaborators throughout the lifecycle; interior and landscape architects are engaged earlier to optimize healing environments; construction managers and contractors take on specialized roles in addressing healthcare-specific complexities; and facility managers serve as key facilitators, bridging design, construction, and long-term operations. This research not only refines AECO practices but also creates a platform for stakeholders to share, learn, and empathize. Future research should explore the model's adaptability in other socio-cultural contexts outside of Thailand and further fine-tuning it.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: collaboration; healing environment; healthcare architecture; hospital construction; integrated project delivery; professional practice
Index terms: integrated project delivery, landscape architect, manager, complexity, professional practice, thematic analysis, construction manager, adaptability, healthcare building construction, methodology, collaboration, adaptation, designer, facilitator, platform, collaborative practice, architect, Thailand, lifecycle, reflection
Subjects: practitioner, user focus, contractual arrangements, digital design, Geography, research methods, collaborative management, building construction, profession, project delivery, professional development, methods and analysis, management, systems engineering
Topics: Procurement, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here