Deep learning-based forecasting for construction project duration at completion

Laura-Portugal, C. and Hammad, A. (2026) Deep learning-based forecasting for construction project duration at completion. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(8), pp. 1543-1561. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Project duration-at-completion (DAC) forecasting is a significant challenge in construction, where inaccuracies can lead to inefficient resource allocation, poor risk management, cost overruns, liquidated damages, and unrealistic stakeholder expectations. Especially during the construction phase, which manages the largest project budget and meets contractual milestones. This research aims to enhance DAC forecast accuracy by leveraging historical data using Deep Learning (DL), providing weekly work packages-level and project-level predictions. A Data Acquisition Model (DAM) collected duration-influencing factors per work package in a time series format, to then apply Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), One-Dimensional Convolutional Neural Network (CONV-1D), and Multilayer Perceptron (MLP) algorithms. Once the optimal was selected, the overall DAC was computed by consolidating individual predictions and using the current project schedule, Precedence Diagramming and Critical Path Methods. By doing so, LSTM outperformed MLP and CONV-1D, with MASE 0.27, 0.29, and 0.54 for Concrete, Excavation and Backfill work packages. The LSTM-based model surpassed the widely used EVM and ESM, while a Monte Carlo-based sensitivity analysis verified its robustness. This deep-learning model was automated through a GUI, delivering forecasting Gantt charts, performance curves, critical path charts, interacting with Primavera P6 to capture data. This model aims to leverage Artificial Intelligence capabilities in construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: artificial intelligence; construction project management; deep learning; duration-at-completion; forecasting software; multivariate time series; project forecasting; work package level forecasting
Index terms: construction project, package, data acquisition, deep learning, construction project management, sensitivity analysis, duration, liquidated damages, neural network, critical path, critical path method, excavation, cost overrun, time series, forecasting, influencing factor, multilayer, resource allocation, artificial intelligence, accuracy, risk management, construction phase
Subjects: specialized materials and systems, project management theory and practice, operations research, financial and cost management, construction operations, risk assessment, contractual remedy, project delivery, production management, data collection methods, data science, resource management, project controls, professional development, artificial intelligence, prediction and forecasting, contractual arrangements, environmental hazards
Topics: Digital Applications, Procurement, Research Practice, Cost Management, Information Management, Sustainability, Site Management, Project Management, Time Control, Construction Materials, Contract Administration, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here