Lim, J.; Fauzan, F. and Oey, E. (2026) Evaluating green building certification criteria for small health care centre (Puskemas) in Jakarta area: From GREENSHIP to Puske-GREENSHIP framework. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(3), pp. 1047-1067. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose – With global warming and climate change, there is widespread awareness of the need to develop and run green buildings. This applies to public facilities such as the local health care centre (HCC). The study evaluates the criteria needed for green buildings for smaller scale local HCC (called Puskesmas) in the greater Jakarta area. It also compares the pioneer green HCC project (Tebet HCC) by assessing their Edge certification with the more extensive GREENSHIP framework. Design/methodology/approach – To address the needs of all similar HCC in the Jakarta area, we examined the GREENSHIP criteria utilizing the SIPA Eisenhower technique. This approach assessed the criteria in terms of importance, urgency and feasibility. We then explore this framework by scoring the pioneer green HCC project (Tebet HCC) with GREENSHIP framework and SIPA Eisenhower approach. Findings – The results revealed that the criteria can be divided into eight quadrants. For small-scale HCCs like Puskesmas in the Jakarta area, we offer a reduced version of GREENSHIP called Puske-GREENSHIP, where certain irrelevant criteria with limited influence are to be excluded. For Tebet HCCs we also offered a set of recommendation to help them increase their current scoring with the (simplified) GREENSHIP framework. Research limitations/implications – The study offers a simplified version of green building certification criteria for smaller scale HCCs in the greater Jakarta area. With Puske-GREENSHIP the opportunity of having green building for local HCCs in the greater Jakarta area can be made more feasible. Originality/value – The value of the study lies in our pragmatism in proposing the Puske-GREENSHIP which should align with the SGD objectives for public facilities such as HCC while at the same time still practical in implementation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | edge; eisenhower; green building; GREENSHIP; health care centre; sipa |
| Index terms: | implementation, health care, green building certification, global warming, certification, Jakarta, climate change, pragmatism, methodology, green building |
| Subjects: | administrative processes, philosophical concept, design practice, public and environmental health, research methods, sustainable design, Geography, contractual arrangements, climate science |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Contract Administration, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Procurement, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here