Lizarralde, G.; Wachsmuth, D.; Özdoğan, F. and Cossu, M. (2026) Critical reconstruction theory and the invention of post-disaster response. Buildings & Cities, 7(1), pp. 683-703. ISSN 2632-6655
Abstract
No comprehensive theory of reconstruction currently exists. This hinders scholars' capacity to anticipate patterns, as well as practitioners' possibilities to evaluate alternatives, design equitable recovery processes and implement appropriate policies. The presented analysis of the pertinent literature over 50 years shows that the notion of reconstruction has been reified in different ways. This constant reinvention of post-disaster response mobilises seven recurrent framings at different levels of intensity: urban renewal, building quality, relief, development, empowerment, vulnerability reduction and adaptation. These framings rely on four mechanisms (policy, planning, projects and social organisation) and respond to three pressure factors (time, visibility and political agendas). Insights from Critical Theory and critical disaster studies are harnessed to develop a critical conceptualisation of decisions aimed at rebuilding after destruction. Reconstruction is conceptualised as a deeply political and normative process of negotiation over change and continuity—involving what should be transformed, what must be preserved, and what trade-offs are acceptable given time and cost constraints. Its success lies in establishing democratic spaces for deliberation and expanding the range of 'satisficing' solutions that affected people can choose and value. This provides a theoretical foundation for understanding reconstruction as processes of concertation, arbitration and justice.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | co-creation; critical theory; disaster management; disaster reconstruction; governance; post-disaster response; social justice, agency |
| Index terms: | vulnerability, practitioner, agency, social organization, empowerment, justice, social justice, rebuilding, framing, urban renewal, disaster management, co-creation, arbitration, negotiation, recovery, reconstruction, governance, disaster response, adaptation |
| Subjects: | practitioner, user focus, legal systems, conceptual models, operations management, financial risk, design process, environmental hazards, building construction, dispute resolution, business, social theory, management, post-disaster and reconstruction, conflict resolution, sociology, emergency and crisis management |
| Topics: | Governance, Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Cost Management, Human Resources, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Ethics, Legal Issues |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here