Intelligent optimization framework for tunnel construction organization driven by multi-source data and process-level simulation

Ma, G.; Chen, Y. and Du, C. (2026) Intelligent optimization framework for tunnel construction organization driven by multi-source data and process-level simulation. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(7), pp. 1299-1319. ISSN 1562-3599

Abstract

Tunnel construction faces challenges including complex geological conditions, strong inter-coupling among processes, and frequent dynamic disturbances. Existing organization methods struggle to achieve dynamic multi-objective optimization of quality, schedule, cost, and safety. This paper proposes an intelligent optimization framework integrating multi-source information with process-level simulation, which decouples spatiotemporal coupling in complex systems through three-level hierarchical modeling. By combining disturbance prediction with simulation calibration, it enables dynamic adjustment of plans and multi-objective optimization. First, a parametric process model is built using hierarchical modeling, with dynamic algorithms simulating random disturbances. Second, expert evaluation and simulation calibration establish mapping relationships between quality scores and production data. Finally, a closed-loop system of "planning–execution–monitoring–optimization" is formed through dynamic feedback. This research contributes: (1) A spatiotemporal-decoupled hierarchical modeling method overcoming coupling limitations of static models; (2) Collaborative simulation for disturbance events enhancing prediction accuracy through joint modeling of cycles and maintenance strategies; (3) A dual-driven mechanism integrating expert knowledge with simulation data, enabling adaptive adjustment of multi-objective weights.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: dynamic multi-objective optimization; hierarchical process simulation; intelligent management; tunnel construction organization
Index terms: mapping, face, strategy, accuracy, process simulation, static model, evaluation, modelling, monitoring, multi-objective optimization, complex system, closed-loop system, coupling, tunnel construction
Subjects: psychology, analytical methods, spatial and geospatial analysis, algorithms, sustainable design, modelling and simulation, data analysis and analytics, control systems, systems engineering, management, civil engineering, professional development
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here