Moghaddam, S.; Dashti, M. S.; Alvanchi, A. and Khanzadi, M. (2026) An integrated BIM-based augmented reality framework for improving facility maintenance management. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(3), pp. 2007-2047. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – Facility maintenance management (FMM) faces ongoing challenges primarily due to the inefficiencies of existing approaches in streamlining information flow, resulting in increased costs and reduced productivity. This study proposes a comprehensive framework that integrates building information modeling (BIM) and augmented reality (AR) to enhance FMM procedures. Design/methodology/approach – To achieve this objective, the proposed framework incorporates a dedicated BIM interface for maintenance managers and an AR interface for field workers, both of which are integrated with a cloud database. The AR interface features an innovative simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)-based registration method, eliminating the need for prior site scanning and reducing development costs. The framework supports both preventive and emergency maintenance workflows by providing relevant information to managers and field workers. A case study was conducted to evaluate the framework's usability by implementing a prototype system in the engine room of an auto parts manufacturing factory. Findings – The usability of the proposed system was evaluated through two test scenarios, followed by questionnaires to assess performance and user satisfaction. Results indicated high satisfaction with the BIM interface (88.13%) and the AR interface (83.75%). Moreover, participants found the framework effective in enhancing productivity in daily maintenance tasks, improving navigation to work orders and facilitating collaboration through cloud-based databases. Originality/value – This study contributes to the body of knowledge in the FMM area by proposing a novel framework that integrates BIM and AR to support maintenance tasks, aiming to achieve greater practicality and cost-effectiveness. Furthermore, it highlights the need for ongoing research into such integrations in FMM, pointing to a promising direction for enhancing maintenance management systems.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | augmented reality; building information modeling; facility maintenance management; simultaneous localization and mapping; tracking and registration |
| Index terms: | localization, maintenance management system, productivity, streamlining, database, building information modelling, maintenance management, satisfaction, case study, workflow, body of knowledge, user satisfaction, collaboration, methodology, mapping, integration, questionnaire, augmented reality, face, prototype, usability, information flow, cost-effectivenes, manager |
| Subjects: | research methods, maintenance engineering, spatial and geospatial analysis, client relations, practitioner, visualization, urban planning, psychology, knowledge management, economics, management, data management, organizational analysis, information systems, user-centered design, data collection methods, modelling and simulation, project delivery |
| Topics: | Project Management, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Governance, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here