Murali, D.; Suresh, M. and Raman, R. (2026) Breaking down to build up: How deconstruction and carbon finance foster sustainable, resilient construction in the industry 5.0 era. Construction Innovation, 26(4), pp. 1006-1033. ISSN 1471-4175
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to seek and identify key enablers influencing the integration of deconstruction and carbon finance to improve sustainable and resilient construction in the Industry 5.0 era and then examines how these enablers relate to one another and rank, classify and prioritize them appropriately. Design/methodology/approach – This study adopts the Integrated Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-Interpretive Structural Modeling-Matrice d'impacts Croises Multiplication Appliquee a un Classment (DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC) methodology. Findings – The key enablers are the circular economy approach with closed-loop material flow, prioritizing material recovery and reuse, and structuring carbon credits for affordability. Research limitations/implications – The construction industry can advance toward environmentally friendly, sustainable building techniques and help achieve the larger objectives of carbon neutrality and environmental preservation by adopting the study's guiding principles. Practical implications – This study implies switching to circular rather than linear economic methods. It is still unrealistic to achieve zero carbon emissions, which is why carbon finance is important because it allows companies to trade carbon credits and encourages negative carbon activities and to structure and trade carbon credits affordably so that businesses of all sizes can participate. To extend the lives of current materials and reduce waste, it is imperative to maximize their reuse and minimize their disposal. Originality/value – The novelty of this research lies in introducing carbon trade finance concepts to the construction sector, particularly focusing on the deconstruction phase, to enhance sustainability and resilience in construction practices in the Industry 5.0 era.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | carbon finance; deconstruction; industry 5.0; resilience construction; sustainability |
| Index terms: | sustainable building, neutrality, decision-making, construction sector, methodology, integration, laboratory, carbon emission, material recovery, affordability, construction industry, interpretive structural modelling, prioritizing, environmentally friendly, circular economy |
| Subjects: | research management, sustainable construction, industry analysis, organizational analysis, economic analysis, ethical practice, data analysis and analytics, research methods, decision analysis, sustainable design, climate science |
| Topics: | Business Strategy, Research Practice, Organizational Design, Risk Management, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here