Ng, Y. Y.; Ma, Q. and Yam, M. C. H. (2026) Optimizing subcontractor selection: A dual-model AHP framework for aligning client and contractor priorities in construction. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 24(4), pp. 869-893. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose – The construction industry depends on a multi-layered subcontracting system, where subcontractors account for nearly 80% of project value and significantly impact outcomes. However, the priorities of contractors and clients in subcontractor selection often diverge, and the client's perspective is underrepresented. This study aims to address the gap by identifying key selection factors and developing dual analytic hierarchy process (AHP) models that explicitly capture client and contractor perspectives. Design/methodology/approach – A total of 16 structured interviews were conducted to capture detailed qualitative data. Qualitative inputs were synthesized using constant comparative analysis and consolidated into thematic categories. Kendall's Tau correlation was applied to assess alignment between client and contractor rankings. Delphi surveys with another 16 experts were then used to derive weighting criteria for AHP models, which were validated through two real-world case studies. Findings – A total of 17 key factors of subcontractor selection were identified and categorized into seven main themes. Correlation analysis revealed moderate but non-significant alignment (t = 0.42), indicating systematic divergence in priorities. The client-side AHP model emphasized quality (weight = 0.202), followed by risk and safety (0.165), while the contractor-side model prioritized cost and resources (0.240), followed by time and scheduling (0.183). Case validation showed that actual subcontractor choices reflected these distinct priorities, confirming the predictive validity of the dual-model approach. Originality/value – Theoretically, the proposed AHP models advance the subcontractor system literature by introducing dual perspectives that aid in evaluating subcontractor selection. Practically, the dual AHP models provide managers with targeted decision support. Contractor-led tenders can be strengthened through financial audits and resource checks, whereas client-led evaluations benefit from quality reviews.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | analytic hierarchy process; client perspective; contractor perspective; dual model; subcontractor selection |
| Index terms: | audit, validity, correlation analysis, case study, Delphi survey, construction industry, subcontracting system, comparative analysis, manager, interview, scheduling, decision support, subcontractor selection, subcontractor, methodology, validation |
| Subjects: | research methods, operations research, organization, evaluation and assessment methods, practitioner, decision analysis, statistical analysis, industry analysis, performance measurement, professional development, data analysis and analytics, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Information Management, Time Control, Risk Management, Quality Management, Supply Chain Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here