Whang, S W and Flanagan, R (2015) Minimisation of risk exposure at the pre-production stage through the use of contractor-led design management. In: Raiden, A and Aboagye-Nimo, E (eds.) Proceedings of 31st Annual ARCOM Conference, 7-9 September 2015, Lincoln, UK.
Abstract
Many large scale construction projects (LSPs) are designed in a collaboration between famous international architects and local design firms. Design management usually evolves as a tool at the design stage for designers and design solution. One of the special characteristics of the Korean construction environment places a duty and responsibility on the contractor to coordinate and check design information. Hence the contractor must manage and integrate diverse design information into the production process. This research considers how the design management diagram (DMD) can help as a part of the system at the pre-production stage of LSPs in Korea. The pre-production stage receives insufficient attention from the research community from the perspective of design management; it is a complex process involving interdependence, risk, and uncertainty. Through the application of a DMD from the pre-production stage, the contractor can predict and manage the design-related uncertainty during production stages. The design management factors (DMFs) were analysed by the analytic hierarchy process (AHP), and then used complexity system theory to understand the interrelationship between the causal factors. DMFs are presented as a causal loop diagram which can help the contractor to cope with design-related uncertainties at the early production phase.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | causal loop diagram; contractor-led design management; international design team; pre-production stage |
| Index terms: | design team, production process, designer, design firm, minimization, exposure, interdependence, duty, complexity, collaboration, construction project, design management, design stage, architect |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, systems engineering, algorithms, public and environmental health, manufacturing engineering, management, design process, production management, professional practice, contractual role, profession, practitioner |
| Topics: | Contract Administration, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here