Autonomous UAV navigation for close-range image acquisition of scaffold joints

Paik, S.; Chung, D.; Kim, Y.; Kim, J. and Kim, H. (2026) Autonomous UAV navigation for close-range image acquisition of scaffold joints. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(7): 04026081, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Scaffold joints are critical structural elements that require continuous inspection. However, their small size and wide distribution make manual inspection inefficient. To address this challenge, this paper proposes an autonomous uncrewed aerial vehicle (UAV)-based method to efficiently capture close-range images of joints for inspection. The first module generates a real-time three-dimensional (3D) point cloud map using LiDAR and simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) and converts it into a bird's-eye view (BEV) image to provide spatial context. The second module plans scanning paths based on these data and performs three functions: (1) detecting scaffolds in the BEV image using a deep learning model and segments them into scan units; (2) evaluating scan feasibility based on UAV accessibility and obstacles; and (3) prioritizing and selecting the next target based on path efficiency and generates a collision-free trajectory. Experimental results at two outdoor construction sites demonstrated that the proposed method captured close-range images of all joints via autonomous flight, achieving 100% (207 joints) coverage. This study proposes a novel UAV-based method for autonomous close-range scanning of scaffolds, enabling precise monitoring of detailed components such as joints.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: construction site, accessibility, localization, inspection, monitoring, prioritizing, mapping, efficiency, deep learning, point cloud, module, acquisition
Subjects: quality assurance, decision analysis, control systems, architectural elements, artificial intelligence, digital design, urban planning, performance management, business, spatial and geospatial analysis, inclusive design, work location
Topics: Risk Management, Quality Management, Governance, Site Management, Design Practice, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here