Parisi, L. and Donyavi, S. (2026) Advancing materials procurement processes in construction: A framework for optimising technology integration in SMEs' construction supply chains. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(7), pp. 1365-1389. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Materials procurement is a key challenge for construction SMEs, often hampered by limited resources, manual workflows, and poor communication. This study introduces a scalable framework that leverages accessible digital tools—such as mobile apps, RFID, and cloud-based systems—to streamline procurement. A mixed-methods approach, including case studies, interviews, surveys, and observations, was used to evaluate the framework across six SMEs in various construction sectors. Results showed notable gains: a 34% reduction in order processing time, a 25% drop in material waste, and a 35% improvement in inventory accuracy. These improvements were statistically confirmed and attributed to the framework's components. The model's phased rollout eased financial and training pressures, while built-in feedback loops allowed SMEs to adapt procurement practices to evolving project and supplier demands. By addressing real-world implementation barriers, the study provides a practical, validated roadmap for digital transformation tailored to SME needs. The framework not only improves cost control and delivery timelines but also enhances competitiveness in a digital construction landscape.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction supply chain; digital databases; GPS; materials procurement; RFID; SMEs; technology integration |
| Index terms: | database, transformation, inventory, case study, digital construction, implementation, construction supply chain, competitiveness, accuracy, survey, interview, procurement process, workflow, construction sector, cost control, integration, feedback loop |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, inventory management, market analysis, business, data collection methods, control systems, construction logistics, financial and cost management, management, professional development, organizational analysis, data management, information systems, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Procurement, Engineering Principles, Supply Chain Management, Research Practice, Information Management, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Organizational Design, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here