Park, J. and Moon, S. (2026) Advancing BIM adoption in infrastructure: Addressing standard development, geographic coordinate systems, and common data environment. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(8), pp. 1584-1598. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Building Information Modeling (BIM) has progressively become a staple in the building industry over the past several decades. Despite its widespread adoption in building projects, the implementation of BIM in infrastructure projects has encountered significant challenges. This paper explores three primary obstacles hindering the broader application of BIM in infrastructure ventures: the absence of a standardized level of development or level of detail for existing conditions and infrastructures; the complexities associated with selecting and managing geographic coordinate systems; and the issues arising from coordinating multiple common data environments. Drawing on ethnographic methods-such as observation and open-ended conversations with BIM managers experienced in global infrastructure projects-this study highlights the critical need to address these challenges at the outset of each project. Failure to do so may result in avoidable cost overruns and delays. By examining the root causes of these difficulties, this research offers insights into enhancing BIM implementation processes, specifically within infrastructure contexts. Uniquely, this study emphasizes the challenges and practical considerations that emerge from the distinctive nature of infrastructure, thereby contributing a practice-informed perspective that complements existing research. By identifying and addressing these challenges, the industry can move toward a more efficient, cost-effective, and timely framework for project execution.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building information modeling; common data environment; ethnographic research method; geographic coordinate systems; infrastructure; standard development |
| Index terms: | complexity, level of development, common data environment, drawing, level of detail, manager, implementation, infrastructure project, building industry, cost overrun, building information modelling |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, practitioner, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, systems engineering, information systems, design practice, financial and cost management, technical documentation, computing systems |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Procurement, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Research Practice, Cost Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here