Enhancing construction safety training through emotion-eliciting virtual reality

Patil, K. R.; Ayer, S. and Bhandari, S. (2026) Enhancing construction safety training through emotion-eliciting virtual reality. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(15), pp. 276-298. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – This study explores the potential of virtual reality (VR) to enhance construction safety training by eliciting critical emotional responses, particularly in novices lacking firsthand experience with hazardous scenarios. By targeting emotions like fear and distress, VR aims to improve hazard recognition and foster risk-averse behaviors, addressing gaps in traditional training methods. Design/methodology/approach – The study involved 55 construction management students using a VR simulation integrated with haptic feedback to replicate accident scenarios. Emotional responses were measured through galvanic skin response (GSR) metrics, pre- and post-experience self-reported questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. Participants navigated a virtual construction site, identified hazards and experienced a simulated accident to assess emotional and behavioral impacts. Findings – The VR simulation significantly increased emotional arousal, with GSR data showing a strong effect size and significant increases in distress, guilt, fear and shame. Participants reported heightened empathy, guilt and responsibility during post-VR interviews. These findings suggest that VR effectively engages users emotionally, bridging the experiential gap in traditional training by replicating hazardous scenarios with high realism and impact. Practical implications – The study highlights VR's potential as a scalable, immersive training tool for eliciting emotional and physiological precursors associated with risk-averse decision-making in the construction industry. By evoking anticipatory emotions theorized to influence risk perception, VR may help prepare novices to engage more cautiously with hazardous scenarios, though the link between these precursors and actual safety behavior requires field validation. Originality/value – This research provides empirical evidence of VR's capability to elicit emotional responses that influence decision-making in hazardous environments. It offers valuable insights for developing innovative, emotionally engaging safety training programs for the construction sector.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction virtual reality; hazard recognition; presence; safety training; virtual reality
Index terms: questionnaire, validation, evidence, program, decision-making, methodology, construction sector, construction safety, interview, replicating, construction site, risk perception, presence, virtual reality, realism, construction industry, safety training, distress, safety behaviour
Subjects: evaluation and assessment methods, environmental science, structural engineering, research methods, environmental hazards, research management, data collection methods, virtual reality, work location, professional development, education and knowledge transfer, software systems, industry analysis, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, decision analysis
Topics: Digital Applications, Site Management, Information Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Sustainability
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here