Righetto, E.; Micelli, E. and Pellegrino, M. (2026) Can the deep retrofit of the housing stock cost less? Learning curves and the costs of off-site industrialised construction in France. Construction Management and Economics, 44(5), pp. 359-380. ISSN 0144-6193
Abstract
The transition to energy-efficient buildings, central to the European EPBD Directive, requires deep retrofitting to reduce consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. However, high construction costs and fragmentation of the supply chain limit its large-scale deployment. Therefore, it is essential to investigate whether the adoption of off-site technologies can reduce construction costs, increasing the efficiency of production processes and the financial viability of interventions. The study assesses the extent to which learning-by-doing mechanisms in off-site production processes have reduced the costs of deep retrofitting, improving efficiency and productivity. The research analyses 22 French social housing projects completed between 2018 and 2025, including single-family homes and multi-family buildings. Using logarithmic learning curves, the relationship between unit construction costs and cumulative production is quantified, considering the sample both in aggregate form and distinguishing between the two types of buildings. The results show a significant reduction in costs, with average learning rates of 7.7% for single-family homes, 12.4% for apartments and 7.2% for the aggregate sample. Although lower than typical values in other industrial sectors, the data confirm the impact of learning by doing on the economic viability of deep retrofitting. Overall, the estimated rates place the industrialisation process at an intermediate stage of technological maturity: sufficiently advanced to generate significant reductions, but still constrained by scale, supply chain fragmentation, and operational complexity.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular construction; construction cost; energiesprong; experience curve; learning by doing; learning curve; learning rate; off-site construction |
| Index terms: | off-site production, fragmentation, productivity, financial viability, energy-efficient building, aggregate, industrialization, construction cost, retrofitting, off-site construction, efficiency, industrialized construction, consumption, social housing, complexity, greenhouse gas emission, housing stock, production process, France |
| Subjects: | materials science, building construction, manufacturing engineering, sustainable design, economic development, housing and residential development, systems engineering, environmental health, financial and cost management, industry analysis, business, construction type, consumer economics, Geography, performance management, renovation and retrofit, management, business management |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Stakeholder Management, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here