Roberts, C. J. and Edwards, D. J. (2026) Building surveying education within UK higher education institutions: Exploring patterns, trends and future developments. International Journal of Building Pathology and Adaptation, 44(4), pp. 950-975. ISSN 2398-4708
Abstract
Purpose – This research aims to identify the prevailing provision of building surveying educational courses within the United Kingdom (UK) and examine the pressures confronting the higher education (HE) sector via a critical analysis of published data. Such work has not been previously undertaken. An in-depth discussion is presented with an accompanying theoretical model of institutional decision-making which highlights the deleterious impacts of utilising prevailing statistical indicators to measure the sector's performance. Design/methodology/approach – An inductive and interpretivist methodological approach was adopted that utilises a three-stage "waterfall" approach to analyse secondary data. A sample of HE institutions offering building surveying courses is then critically analysed in terms of: course provisions and geographical location; prevailing accreditation and isolation from alternative courses within the wider built environment; and course performance and student satisfaction. Findings – While statistical performance criteria used to measure building surveying courses' performance meets UK Government-imposed checks and balances it systematically fails to align with societal needs to adequately repair, manage and improve building stock. The polemic discourse presented concludes that established wisdom regarding course performance measurement requires reconsideration to enable the HE sector to meet society's future building and infrastructure demands. Originality/value – A novel approach to analysing building surveying course provisions is provided that utilises the tools, techniques and methods adopted by governments and HE institutions themselves to measure course performance. The findings presented constitute the first attempt to critically analyse how the current modus operandi is impacting upon educational provisions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building surveying; funding crisis; graduate outcomes; higher education; national student survey; statistical indicators |
| Index terms: | performance criteria, higher education, society, United Kingdom, building surveying, higher education institution, building stock, performance measurement, decision-making, funding, survey, secondary data, student satisfaction, methodology, repair, built environment |
| Subjects: | asset management, communities and social development, educational institutions, economic analysis, decision analysis, professions and roles, professional development, data collection methods, infrastructure and transport systems, performance measurement, Geography, maintenance engineering, research methods |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Research Practice, Urban Studies, Stakeholder Management, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Geographical Context, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here