Safikhani, S.; Shafaat, A. and Sartipipour, M. (2026) Automated project rescheduling with preemptive activity splitting for baseline restoration. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(6): 04026065, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper introduces an automated project scheduling framework tailored to the complexities of construction environments, with a particular emphasis on preemptive activity splitting. The proposed method builds on the preemptive multi-mode resource-constrained project scheduling problem formulation and integrates systems thinking with scenario-based optimization to support dynamic rescheduling decisions. By enabling activities to be interrupted and resumed across alternative modes, the framework better captures real-world project execution dynamics compared to conventional deterministic methods. Weekly baseline plans serve as reference points to guide a rolling-horizon rescheduling process that aims to minimize execution deviations while maintaining cost efficiency. Applied to a mechanical system installation case, the framework achieves a 17.57% reduction in recovery cost relative to conventional compression methods, demonstrating improved adaptability and reduced reliance on extensive input data. These results demonstrate the approach's strong adaptability and its practical potential for construction planning systems, particularly in volatile project environments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | activity splitting; automated rescheduling; delay; preemption |
| Index terms: | cost efficiency, systems thinking, compression, restoration, construction planning, complexity, recovery, mechanical system, adaptability, project scheduling, deviation, dynamics |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, user focus, construction planning, economics, project controls, financial and cost management, material properties and characteristics, operations management, mechanical systems, analytical methods, renovation and retrofit |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Site Management, Construction Materials, Time Control, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Design Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here