Said, H. and Cao, J. (2026) Optimizing building prefabrication strategies by balancing modularity and complicatedness. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(7): 04026097, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Offsite construction can enhance productivity, quality, and sustainability in the building industry. However, the adoption of prefabrication strategies is limited by a lack of early-phase evaluation tools, when detailed design and cost information are unavailable. This paper proposes a decision-support multi-objective framework for developing prefabrication strategies at the conceptual design stage by balancing system modularity and complicatedness. Graph modeling is used to transform the conceptual design into modular designs under hybrid panelized-volumetric strategies. Modularity is measured using a community-based index, while complicatedness is quantified by the variance of modules' structural complexity. Trade-off Pareto-optimal prefabrication strategies are generated using evolutionary optimization. The demonstration is implemented using an Industry Foundation Classes (IFC)-based data from an actual housing project. Results show higher modularity often increases complicatedness. The finding provides critical insights to explore prefabrication strategies in the early stages of the project development to achieve an optimal balance between the project's modularity and complicatedness.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | complexity; complicatedness; graph modeling; modularity; prefabricated buildings |
| Index terms: | complexity, conceptual design, community-based, housing project, modularity, strategy, module, building industry, modular design, industry foundation classes, prefabrication, modelling, prefabricated building, project development, evaluation tool, variance, cost information, productivity |
| Subjects: | design practice, management, measurement and scaling, industry analysis, design flexibility, systems engineering, design methods, project delivery, architectural elements, accounting and finance, housing and residential development, building construction, communities and social development, evaluation and assessment methods, computational design, analytical methods |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Stakeholder Management, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here