The "last place where we can be men": Understanding women's marginalisation in the construction industry through a community of practice lens

Sandri, O.; Holdsworth, S. and Turner, M. (2026) The "last place where we can be men": Understanding women's marginalisation in the construction industry through a community of practice lens. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(15), pp. 203-224. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – This study examines how social practices within Communities of Practice (CoP) in the Australian construction industry sustain gender biases. It investigates how masculinity is performed and learned on worksites and how these norms shape women's participation and identity. The purpose is to identify the social practices that reinforce exclusion, assess whether these practices are changing and identify opportunities to accelerate progress toward more gender-inclusive worksites. Design/methodology/approach – A qualitative methodology was employed, using interviews with men in the Australian construction industry to explore their perceptions of women and gender roles. Findings were considered using a social practice lens to understand how masculinities are learned, performed and reinforced within CoPs. Findings – The findings reveal that women often adopt masculine traits to gain acceptance, yet full participation in CoP remains elusive for those who do not conform. While gender quotas and training programs have prompted some change, progress is inconsistent. Innovations in work design and evolving attitudes suggest movement toward inclusion, but entrenched biases remain. Practical implications – The research identifies that efforts to improve gender inclusion in construction must address informal workplace practices. Lasting cultural transformation requires attention to how masculinities and femininities are negotiated within everyday practices. Practical interventions should focus on transforming how masculinities are enacted and valued in daily interactions. Originality/value – By using a CoP lens, this study offers a different perspective on the maintenance of gender bias and identifies where interventions can be most effective in shifting workplace norms and supporting women in construction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: community of practice; construction industry; gender bias; social practice theory; women
Index terms: masculinity, interview, movement, methodology, bias, program, social practice, practice lens, norms, social practice theory, communities of practice, transformation, identity, women, construction industry, interaction
Subjects: health behaviours and lifestyles, knowledge management, theoretical framing, research methods, behavioral psychology, data collection methods, business, research design and methodology, software systems, social theory, probability and distributions, sociology, industry analysis
Topics: Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Information Management
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here