Possibility of personalization and customization of the workplace by knowledge workers

Sari, R. and Pekeriçli, M. K. (2026) Possibility of personalization and customization of the workplace by knowledge workers. Building Research & Information, 54(4), pp. 410-428. ISSN 0961-3218

Abstract

Workplace satisfaction is the key to the health, well-being and productivity of knowledge workers. The mismatch between the physical environment and the personal desire of the worker negatively affects satisfaction and productivity. Although employee comfort and well-being have been deeply studied for the last decades, the current workplace services and practices lack allowing workplace configuration by the knowledge workers, where the knowledge worker is the decision-maker on workplace design and usage. This article investigates the configurability of workplace areas by the knowledge worker prior to use and occupation. The study unveils that current workplace services cannot meet the workplace configuration of the knowledge worker due to organizational, operational and facilities management reasons. However, in-field studies presented that when configuration options were provided, the knowledge workers pretended to make selections to personalize and customize the workplace environment, with having increased level of satisfaction due to the configuration process. On the other hand, the proposed concepts preserve diverse risks and handicaps in facilities management perspectives, although the possible implementation of the concept can maximize workplace satisfaction, comfort, well-being and productivity of the knowledge worker.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: knowledge worker as decision-maker; office workplaces; personalization and customization in workplace environment; workplace configuration; workplace service provision
Index terms: comfort, option, mismatch, implementation, satisfaction, customization, productivity, workplace design, configuration, workplace environment, well-being, facilities management, field study, occupation
Subjects: project delivery, mental health and wellbeing, systems engineering, occupational health and safety management, sociology, decision analysis, design practice, management, contractual arrangements, construction manufacturing, engineering problems, research methods
Topics: Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety, Procurement, Risk Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here