Integrated time-cost-safety trade-off analysis and visual safety heat maps for enhanced construction performance

Shams, A. and Marzouk, M. (2026) Integrated time-cost-safety trade-off analysis and visual safety heat maps for enhanced construction performance. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(8): 04026114, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Construction sites remain among the most hazardous work environments, with safety risks threatening workers and project performance. While safety-leading indicators are widely recognized in accident prevention, there remains a gap in integrating these indicators within decision-support frameworks that account for time, cost, and safety trade-offs. This study addresses this gap by proposing a framework that combines multiobjective optimization and safety visualization to support construction decisions. The framework evaluates safety performance through an analytical hierarchy process and structured interviews to weight key safety indicators. These scores are incorporated into a time-cost-safety trade-off analysis using the nondominated sorting genetic algorithm II to generate a Pareto front of optimal solutions. The model generated a set of Pareto-optimal solutions with project durations ranging from 196 to 232 days, total costs between 22 and 26 million Egyptian pound (EGP), and safety risk scores between 180 and 188, demonstrating the trade-offs among the three objectives. A selected solution is integrated into a building information modeling environment, where a custom plug-in visualizes safety performance through a 3D heat map. The framework is applied in a case study to demonstrate its implementation and potential to enhance decision-making. Future work may automate the linkage between safety indicators and project activities, incorporating uncertainty and sustainability into the optimization process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 3D heat map; AHP; multicriteria decision making; multiobjective optimization; NSGA-II; safety evaluation
Index terms: duration, implementation, analytical hierarchy process, work environment, project performance, linkage, construction performance, building information modelling, case study, visualization, safety performance, decision-making, construction site, interview, accident prevention, genetic algorithm, maps
Subjects: work location, performance assessment, business, data collection methods, decision analysis, project controls, occupational health and safety management, information systems, environmental health, management, design practice, project management theory and practice, contractual arrangements, decision-making and optimization, algorithms, spatial and geospatial analysis
Topics: Time Control, Site Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice, Digital Applications, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Risk Management, Procurement, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Project Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here