Risk assessment of mountain tunnel entrance collapse based on pso-LSTM surface settlement prediction

Sun, Y.; Lin, K.; Wang, J.; Zhu, F.; Wang, L. and Lu, L. (2026) Risk assessment of mountain tunnel entrance collapse based on pso-LSTM surface settlement prediction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(3), pp. 2586-2605. ISSN 0969-9988

Abstract

Purpose – Predicting surface settlement at mountain tunnel entrances during construction is increasingly crucial for risk analysis, as the accuracy of these predictions directly impacts collapse risk assessments and personnel safety. Design/methodology/approach – This study introduces a novel approach using a particle swarm optimization (PSO)-optimized long short-term memory (LSTM) neural network for surface settlement prediction. The PSO algorithm optimizes key hyperparameters of the LSTM model, including the number of hidden layer neurons, the learning rate and L2 regularization, while the Adam optimizer refines LSTM iterations. Dropout is used in combination with adaptive L2 regularization parameters to avoid overfitting situations, and sensitivity analysis of the remaining variables ensures the identification of the optimal solution. Findings – The model, based on monitoring data from the Aketepu No. 1 Tunnel's left tunnel, establishes evaluation criteria incorporating error margins and root mean square error (RMSE). By examining the range of maximum (minimum) settlement rates for the cumulative settlement values, the study determined that the section is exposed to an average risk of collapse with slow deformation, which is consistent with actual observations. Originality/value – This suggests that construction can proceed normally, with appropriate monitoring to mitigate the risk of collapse. The PSO-LSTM forecast model presents a promising approach for predicting collapse risks at mountain tunnel entrances.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: collapse risk evaluation; dropout; long short-term memory; mountain tunnels; particle swarm optimization; sensitivity analyses
Index terms: methodology, deformation, risk analysis, mean square error, tunnel, sensitivity analysis, personnel, accuracy, neural network, monitoring, risk assessment
Subjects: environmental hazards, financial risk, research methods, infrastructure and transport systems, professional development, probability and distributions, material properties and characteristics, management, artificial intelligence, control systems
Topics: Engineering Principles, Sustainability, Construction Materials, Information Management, Research Practice, Cost Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Site Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here