Tafese, E. M. and Mengistu, D. G. (2026) Labor productivity management practice in construction companies. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(8), pp. 1527-1542. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Effective labor productivity management (LPM) is critical for the success of construction projects, yet challenges persist in its planning, implementation and monitoring. This study aims to assess LPM practices by focusing on these three management functions, identify key strategies and develop a framework to enhance LPM effectiveness in the context of Ethiopian construction industry. The data was collected from construction companies through a structured questionnaire and semi-structured interviews. In analyzing the quantitative data, while descriptive analysis was used to evaluate the LPM practice, the management strategies were prioritized using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and evaluated against the relevant performance dimensions using Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS). In addition, the qualitative data was analysed thematically focusing on specific objectives of the study. The study revealed the major improvement areas related to the three management functions, and the identified management strategies to enhance effectiveness of the LPM practice are: collaborative planning, integrated scheduling, front-end planning, providing on-the-job training, setting targets for the workforce, financial and nonfinancial incentive schemes, and clash detection. The study underscores integrating management strategies across the management functions to enhance LPM effectiveness. Given shared industry characteristics, the findings are adaptable to other contexts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction companies; labor productivity management; labor productivity planning; monitoring and controlling; site management; training and development |
| Index terms: | preference, questionnaire, management practice, construction project, construction company, strategy, scheduling, collaborative planning, interview, construction industry, implementation, dimension, labour productivity, effectiveness, monitoring, site management, topsis, management strategy |
| Subjects: | decision-making and optimization, production management, decision-making and reasoning, contractual arrangements, construction operations, operations research, urban planning, organization, industry analysis, performance management, management, health monitoring assessment and metrics, control systems, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Procurement, Health and Safety, Project Management, Site Management, Time Control, Governance, Business Strategy, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here