Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui's dual disaster recovery

Urushima, A. Y. F. and Yamaguchi, K. (2026) Post-war reconstruction-as-knowledge practice: Fukui's dual disaster recovery. Buildings & Cities, 7(1), pp. 667-682. ISSN 2632-6655

Abstract

The reconstruction of Fukui city in Japan is examined between 1945 and 1955 after two sequential disasters had occurred: United States Army Air Forces (USAAF) air raid on 19 July 1945 and an earthquake on 28 June 1948. This is framed as a historically situated instance of reconstruction-as-knowledge practice. This paper investigates how technical, bureaucratic and political expertise was mobilised, negotiated and operationalised in rebuilding a mediumsized Japanese city. The central question is how reconstruction—often treated as a logistical or institutional problem—was enacted through documentary and institutional operations that stabilised priorities under constraint. Political leadership mattered, but the analysis foregrounds inscription devices and decision arenas—plans and maps, legal instruments, technical standards, and committee deliberations—through which priorities were stabilised across successive shocks. Zoning, street widening, fireproofing measures, and green-space planning advanced through negotiated coordination among national legislation, prefectural oversight, and municipal committees, balancing risk reduction, feasibility and legitimacy. The article highlights tensions between technocratic planning and everyday recovery needs in a city still recovering from war. Fukui's case shows how planning knowledge was generated and reordered through report circulation, legal interpretation and the standardisation of land readjustment practices, producing a form of 'knowledge ordering under constraint' that reconfigured both governance relations and the post-disaster city. PRACTICE RELEVANCE Fukui shows how disaster recovery can function as a laboratory for adaptive planning in midsized cities. Rather than restoring pre-disaster conditions, Fukui's post-war reconstruction shows how institutional memory, layered governance and civic participation reshaped urban form. Land readjustment and street widening addressed immediate safety concerns while embedding longer term risk reduction into the city's fabric. For policymakers and practitioners, Fukui highlights the value of institutional continuity, prefectural capacity and civic networks that mediate between state authority and local needs. These lessons speak to climate adaptation and compound disasters, underscoring the importance of governance capacity and negotiated planning.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: fukui city; governance capacity; institutional memory; Japan; land readjustment; post-disaster reconstruction; urban planning; urban resilience
Index terms: zoning, practitioner, climate adaptation, space planning, legitimacy, urban planning, urban resilience, maps, risk reduction, circulation, legislation, laboratory, United States, Japan, rebuilding, disaster recovery, post-disaster reconstruction, war, earthquake, urban form, standardization, coordination, land, governance, recovery, reconstruction
Subjects: business, real estate economics, sustainability and resilience, management, performance measurement, post-disaster and reconstruction, sociology, emergency and crisis management, climate science, practitioner, urban planning, operations management, legal systems, spatial and geospatial analysis, urban form and morphology, conflict and crisis studies, Geography, financial risk, design process, urban design, building construction, research management, environmental hazards
Topics: Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Governance, Urban Studies, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Sustainability, Legal Issues, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here