Valizadeh, M.; Azizi, M.; Hosseini, M. R. and Mahoor, P. (2026) A hybrid analysis of reverse logistics barriers in Iranian construction. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment, 15(3), pp. 1225-1254. ISSN 2046-6099
Abstract
Purpose – This paper presents a pioneering investigation into the barriers impeding the adoption of reverse logistics (RL) in the Iranian construction industry, addressing a significant gap in the current literature within the country. Design/methodology/approach – Through a meticulous examination of the literature, complemented by 19 in-depth interviews, a battery of barriers to RL implementation was initially identified, distilled into a final set of 30 barriers, which served as the basis for the design of a structured survey questionnaire. Employing Partial Least Squares–Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), an analysis was conducted on a dataset that comprised of 80 responses. Subsequently, the barriers approved through the PLS- SEM were subjected to prioritization through the application of Fuzzy TOPSIS. Findings – Findings reveal the critical inadequacy of contemporary technology and infrastructure, a foundation essential for the efficacious enactment of RL. This shortfall manifests in procurement and logistics processes plagued by inefficiency and ineffectiveness, as consequences of an immature information and technology ecosystem. Furthermore, the study underscores the dominance of traditional markets where the adoption of secondary materials/products remains sporadic, signaling a crucial area for further research and intervention. Originality/value – This study offers original insights into the significant hurdles that hinder the adoption and integration of RL practices within the Iranian construction industry, an under-explored area within the RL research domain. For industry practitioners, findings point to recommendations for overcoming these barriers in the specific Iranian context while also offering broader insights and lessons that may be relevant to other countries and similar contexts.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | circular economy; closed-loop supply chain; infrastructure projects; PLS-SEM; reverse logistics; waste management |
| Index terms: | partial least square, dataset, integration, methodology, practitioner, waste management, questionnaire, structural equation modelling, survey, interview, implementation, construction industry, infrastructure project, markets, reverse logistics, closed-loop supply chain, investigation, fuzzy topsis, circular economy |
| Subjects: | decision-making and optimization, sustainable design, supply chain operations, research methods, economic analysis, contractual arrangements, practitioner, waste management, sustainable supply chain, statistical analysis, industry analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, organizational analysis, data management, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Procurement, Sustainability, Supply Chain Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here