Generative AI-assisted compliance checking for construction requirements

Wang, L.; Hwang, J.; Han, K. and Gupta, A. (2026) Generative AI-assisted compliance checking for construction requirements. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(8): 04026117, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Compliance checking of construction requirements is critical to ensure that the project is completed and commissioned while meeting the code, standards, and owners' needs. However, traditional compliance-checking approaches struggle to deal with extensive documentation and laborious processes, leading to omissions and inefficiencies. Existing rule-based and machine learning approaches lack adaptability, scalability, and domain-specific understanding. This study addresses these challenges by introducing a generative artificial intelligence (GenAI)-Assisted compliance-checking system that consists of three phases: (1) structuring requirement clauses with an ontology and extracting building information modeling (BIM) project data; (2) fine-Tuning (FT) a large language model (LLM) with ontology concepts and BIM metadata to improve domain-specific knowledge contextualization; and (3) developing a two-step relevance ranking strategy (RRS) to ensure effective and accurate retrieval of requirement clauses, which will integrate project attributes and generate structured compliance-checking reasoning using a GenAI model. A benchmark data set of 100 scenarios of construction compliance checking and evaluation metrics for generated checking outputs are introduced to assess retrieval accuracy and interpretability of reasoning output. Experimental results show that the proposed approach improves requirement retrieval and reasoning accuracy. This GenAI-Assisted system balances automation and expert oversight, allowing construction professionals to efficiently automate compliance checking while retaining control over final compliance decisions. The method, data set, and metrics lay the foundation for a GenAI-Assisted compliance-checking system that is scalable, interpretable, and aligned with real-world construction practices.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: adaptability, machine learning, compliance, reasoning, accuracy, documentation, ontology, large language model, project data, strategy, construction professional, artificial intelligence, automation, building information modelling, owner
Subjects: sociology, information systems, management, education and knowledge transfer, professional development, artificial intelligence, data science, data collection methods, cognitive psychology, automation and robotics, health safety and environment, user focus
Topics: Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Stakeholder Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Engineering Principles, Health and Safety
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here