Yan, L.; Wen, S. and Li, Q. (2026) How the two-tier cross-domain control influence contractor's design behavior: A configurational analysis. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 33(3), pp. 2243-2267. ISSN 0969-9988
Abstract
Purpose – The contractor's design behavior in engineering procurement construction (EPC) mode plays a decisive role in controlling design risks, ensuring construction quality and improving project value in terms of project performance. Organizational control is an important way to intervene and strengthen organizational behavior. Reasonably arranging organizational control of the design projects in EPC mode will greatly affect the contractor's design behavior choices and achieve project goals. There are few existing studies that focus on the contractor's classification design behavior management from the perspective of two-tier cross-domain control of the design projects in EPC mode. To fill the knowledge gap, this study explores how the two-tier cross-domain control linkage effect affects the contractor's design behavior choice of the design projects in EPC mode through a configuration analysis. Design/methodology/approach – This study selects five antecedent variables from the perspective of two-tier cross-domain control (including inter-organizational and intra-organizational controls) through literature review. This study collected 290 valid responses from the design projects in EPC mode practitioners through a questionnaire survey and analyzed the data using fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis. Findings – The results of the necessity and sufficiency analysis indicate that (1) single control is not a necessary condition for contractor's design behavior, but outcome control and social control play a more universal role in generating a contractor's design behavior. (2) The four paths that affect the contractor's design proactive behavior can be divided into two groups: one emphasizes the combined effect of three inter-organizational control, while the other highlights the considerable impact of synergistic inter- and intra-organizational control. (3) There are four paths that affect the contractor's design compliance behavior. Compared with the organizational configuration of the contractor's proactive design behavior, process control should be combined with bureaucratic control and clan control to play a role in the absence of outcome control and social control. Originality/value – This study provides a more detailed explanation for how the linkage effect of the two-tier cross-domain control affects the contractor's design behavior of the design projects in EPC mode. It broadens the application of positive organizational behavior and organizational control theory. In practice, this study provides a suitable control path for mutual benefit and a win-win situation between owners and contractors to promote the success of the design projects in EPC mode.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | contractor's design compliance behavior; contractor's design proactive behavior; design projects in EPC mode; fsqca; two-tier cross-domain control |
| Index terms: | compliance, positive organizational behaviour, organizational control, qualitative comparative analysis, literature review, social control, survey, methodology, proactive behaviour, process control, practitioner, questionnaire, design risk, configuration, outcome control, construction quality, design behaviour, owner, linkage, organizational behaviour, project performance |
| Subjects: | data analysis and analytics, project delivery, data collection methods, business, control systems, sociology, systems engineering, project management theory and practice, psychology, practitioner, cognitive psychology, social justice, quality assurance, research methods, health safety and environment, financial risk |
| Topics: | Health and Safety, Project Management, Engineering Principles, Quality Management, Ethics, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Stakeholder Management, Human Resources, Organizational Design |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here