Zhang, Y.; Yue, H. and Xia, X. (2026) Impact of punishment on safety behavior and the implications for construction safety: A neuroscientific perspective. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(8): 04026112, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Unsafe behaviors among construction personnel have attracted significant global attention, with punishment widely recognized as an effective approach to mitigating such behaviors in the construction industry. However, existing research on the effects of punishment has primarily focused on qualitative behavioral aspects, relying heavily on self-reported measures and subjective assessments, which often result in biased interpretations and inconsistent findings. To address these limitations, this study investigates the impact of punishment at different phases and intensities on construction personnel's safety behavior from a neuroscientific perspective, using electroencephalograms (EEG) and behavioral experiments. Twenty participants from the construction industry completed an image-based hazard recognition task, with results revealing several key findings. First, following a period of enforced punishment, the removal of punitive measures led to improved safety behavior compared with prepunishment levels. Second, workers demonstrated significantly better safety performance under high-intensity punishment compared with low-intensity punishment. Third, the increased amplitudes of error-related negativity (ERN) and feedback-related negativity (FRN) suggest that punishment enhances error monitoring and feedback processing, thereby fostering more cautious behavior and reducing errors. Finally, high-intensity punishment was found to elicit stronger external safety motivation, as evidenced by greater P300 event-related potential (P300) amplitudes under high-intensity punishment compared with low-intensity punishment, and positive feedback was more effective in triggering higher P300 amplitudes than negative feedback. These findings highlight the role of punishment in reducing cognitive conflict and enhancing attention and motivation, providing a neuroscientific basis for developing targeted and effective punishment strategies to improve safety compliance in high-risk construction environments.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction professionals; electroencephalograms; neuroscientific perspective; punishment |
| Index terms: | strategy, construction personnel, motivation, experiment, compliance, unsafe behaviour, construction safety, safety performance, safety behaviour, construction industry, monitoring, construction professional |
| Subjects: | psychology, financial risk, health safety and environment, workforce, data collection methods, control systems, management, professional development, occupational health and safety management, environmental health, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Health and Safety, Site Management, Human Resources, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here