Zhao, N.; Gao, K.; Li, H.; Talebian, N. and Skitmore, M. (2026) System dynamics simulation of factors influencing organizational resilience for subway construction in emergency situations. International Journal of Construction Management, 26(7), pp. 1149-1169. ISSN 1562-3599
Abstract
Rapid urbanization has accelerated subway construction, introducing complex technological and safety challenges that heighten project risks. Enhancing organizational resilience and emergency risk management is thus critical for project success. However, existing studies often rely on static assessments and overlook dynamic interactions among key resilience factors. To address this, this study proposes a simulation framework integrating the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and System Dynamics (SD) to identify, prioritize, and simulate factors affecting organizational resilience in emergencies. Based on accident reports, literature, and expert input, 28 key factors were categorized into four dimensions: prevention, adaptation, restoration, and external environment. AHP assigned factor weights, which were incorporated into an SD model based on China's Z subway project to simulate resilience evolution. Using causal loops and stock-flow diagrams, the model captures feedback mechanisms, with sensitivity analysis identifying leadership mental resilience and accountability in accident investigations as the most critical drivers. The AHP-SD framework offers a structured approach to analyzing resilience dynamics, supporting improved emergency preparedness and risk mitigation in large-scale infrastructure projects.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | emergency situation; influencing factors; organizational resilience; subway construction; system dynamics |
| Index terms: | project success, influencing factor, urbanization, adaptation, risk management, dynamics, accident investigation, infrastructure project, dimension, interaction, prevention, emergency preparedness, sensitivity analysis, organizational resilience, accountability, system dynamics, evolution, restoration, China, risk mitigation |
| Subjects: | environmental science, urban planning, user focus, environmental hazards, liability law, behavioral psychology, Geography, financial risk, health monitoring assessment and metrics, computing systems, risk assessment, business, infrastructure and transport systems, environmental health, systems engineering, project management theory and practice, renovation and retrofit, safety engineering |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Sustainability, Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Organizational Design, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Governance, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here