Anugwo, Iruka Chijindu; Appau, Williams Miller; Attakora-Amaniampong, Elvis and Simpeh, Frederick (2026) Smart, but not spontaneous? Exploring the satisfaction gap and drivers in smart lighting in student housing in Ghana. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 8(S1), pp. 88-98. ISSN 2521-0165
Abstract
Smart lighting is emerging in student housing across Africa. This study assesses the drivers and satisfaction of smart lighting in university housing in Southern Ghana. The study used an embedded research method, including a survey of 334 student residents and interviews with 10 housing managers across five purpose-built student housing facilities at five selected public universities in Southern Ghana. The Relative Importance Index and thematic analysis were used as data analytical techniques. The findings reveal that accommodation needs primarily drove the adoption of smart lighting in student housing. The satisfaction levels of smart lighting were limited to lighting controls in lavatories, bedrooms, study areas, the kitchen, and common areas. However, dissatisfaction with lighting was associated with adjusting to the minimum light intensity and controlling artificial lighting. Technically, the limited influence of facilities management factors on smart lighting adoption poses a significant risk to energy sustainability if left unaddressed. Interviews reveal that students' lack of knowledge impacts their satisfaction with and usage of smart lighting systems. At a minimum, student housing managers and students would need education on smart lighting.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | energy sustainability, smart lighting, sustainable design, student housing, technology acceptance model |
| Index terms: | interview, facilities management, sustainable design, manager, embedded research, satisfaction, public university, relative importance index, survey, student housing, technology acceptance model, bedroom, housing, thematic analysis, Africa, Ghana, lighting control |
| Subjects: | research methods, energy efficiency, educational institutions, risk assessment, regions and continents, practitioner, data collection methods, Geography, acoustic properties, project delivery, methods and analysis, architectural elements, construction type, design process, management |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Education, Construction Technology, Research Practice, Design Practice, Risk Management, Project Management, Roles and Professions, Business Strategy, Geographical Context |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here