Amiri, Mojtaba and Saghatforoush, Ehsan (2026) From exploration to prioritization: Advancing BIM-IOT integration for construction health and safety improvement. Journal of Construction Business and Management, 8(S1), pp. 125-139. ISSN 2521-0165
Abstract
The construction industry faces significant workplace safety-related challenges, with developing countries experiencing disproportionately high accident rates. While Building Information Modeling (BIM) and Internet of Things (IoT) technologies show individual promise for safety enhancement, their integrated application remains underexplored in developing contexts. This study employs a mixed-method approach combining systematic literature review with quantitative survey validation to investigate BIM-IoT integration advantages for construction safety in South Africa. The literature review analyzed peer-reviewed articles published between 2010-2025, while the empirical phase surveyed construction professionals from CIDB-registered companies. Data analysis utilized exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis to validate identified advantages. The systematic review identified fifteen key advantages, with "improved safety monitoring" as the most cited advantage, followed by "real-time decision-making" and "hazard identification". Quantitative validation confirmed strong literature-practice alignment, with the same three advantages ranking highest among practitioners (mean scores 4.28, 4.22, and 4.19 respectively), confirming universal applicability of core advantages. Statistical analysis revealed five underlying dimensions: Real-time Monitoring and Control, Safety Planning and Design, Training and Communication, Investigation and Reporting, and Compliance and Economics. All factors demonstrated excellent reliability. Context-specific insights revealed that South African professionals prioritize regulatory compliance and cost considerations more than global literature suggests, while design-phase hazard elimination ranked lowest despite theoretical recognition. Despite moderate technology familiarity, significant implementation gaps exist, indicating substantial opportunities for safety improvement. This research provides comprehensive quantitative validation of BIM-IoT safety advantages in a developing country context, offering evidence-based priorities for technology adoption and policy development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | advantages, BIM-IOT, integration, construction safety, South Africa |
| Index terms: | evidence, internet, practitioner, developing country, literature review, monitoring, face, regulatory compliance, building information modelling, confirmatory factor analysis, South Africa, dimension, compliance, statistical analysis, systematic literature review, workplace safety, construction industry, developing country context, integration, hazard identification, health and safety, data analysis, investigation, decision-making, construction professional, survey, construction safety, exploration, validation, implementation, technology adoption |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, innovation and technology management, financial risk, health monitoring assessment and metrics, health safety and environment, information systems, evaluation and assessment methods, environmental policy, industry analysis, data science, organizational analysis, psychology, development economics, environmental health, research evaluation and metrics, computing systems, socioeconomic context, data analysis and analytics, professional development, practitioner, control systems, environmental resource management, occupational health, statistical analysis, decision analysis, Geography, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Governance, Risk Management, Information Management, Digital Applications, Site Management, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, International Construction, Procurement, Geographical Context, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here