Alencastro, J; Fuertes, A and de Wilde, P (2016) Improving the quality management systems for energy-efficient social housing projects. In: Chan, P W and Neilson, C J (eds.) Proceedings of 32nd Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2016, Manchester, UK.
Abstract
Buildings are acknowledged to play a large role in the current energy use across the EU. It is regarded that buildings are responsible for up to 40% of the overall energy consumption and thus for 40% of the total amount of greenhouse gas emissions in Europe(BPIE, 2011). Moreover, there is a strong body of knowledge that indicates the existence of a mismatch between the buildings energy performances as predicted at design stage and as measured once the building is in operation, the performance gap (Zero Carbon Hub, 2014, de Wilde, 2014, Menezes et al., 2012, Carbon Trust, 2011).Within this context, the role of construction quality management has been acknowledged as one of the possible causes contributing to the performance gap. Recent studies claim that quality defects are important drivers to poor building performance, especially in respect to thermal behaviour (Johnston et al., 2015, Taylor et al., 2014, Bell et al., 2005). Defects in buildings' fabric, most of them being hidden defects, lead to undesired air permeability, thermal bypass and thermal bridging, and consequently to excessive heat loss and unpredicted energy consumption.The overall aim of this ongoing research is to explore quality management practices and inspection techniques used in new-built and retrofit residential building projects and their possible influence on the thermal performance of buildings. Considering the significant efforts and care placed by Social Housing Associations to provide energy efficient housing to help their residents to reduce energy bills, carbon emissions and improve their comfort levels, the research particularly focuses on social housing developments. This paper’s ambition is to identify, through case studies analysis, areas of improvement in the quality assurance procedures used by Social Housing Associations in the UK, which might have an influence on the final building thermal performance.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building energy performance; construction industry; defects; quality management; social housing. |
| Index terms: | thermal performance, comfort, design stage, performance gap, quality management system, energy consumption, greenhouse gas emission, construction quality, housing, quality management practice, construction industry, quality management, social housing, energy use, body of knowledge, mismatch, energy performance, case study, carbon emission, Europe, residential building, permeability, quality assurance, inspection, building performance |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, engineering problems, construction type, climate science, professional practice, knowledge management, energy systems, project delivery, physical geography and landforms, management, performance management, material properties and characteristics, housing and residential development, occupational health and safety management, industry analysis, environmental health, quality assurance |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Quality Management, Urban Studies, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here