Construction safety knowledge reasoning-capable large language model for hydropower and water conservancy engineering

Chen, Y.; Liu, Q.; Nie, B. and Luo, X. (2026) Construction safety knowledge reasoning-capable large language model for hydropower and water conservancy engineering. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(9): 04026132, ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Hydropower and water conservancy engineering construction (HWCEC) involves high-risk operations and complex safety standards, which challenge traditional general-purpose large language models (LLMs) in reasoning with specialized terminology. To address this, this study proposes a construction safety knowledge reasoning-capable large language model (CSKR-LLM-HWCEC), integrating retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) and knowledge graphs (KG) with LLMs. The CSKR-LLM-HWCEC enhances domain-specific reasoning by combining RAG for knowledge retrieval with LLMs' generative power and incorporating a safety-specific KG to improve logical reasoning and interpretability. Key contributions include: (1) advancing the domain knowledge in HWCEC through RAG-enhanced LLMs; (2) introducing a specialized safety KG to boost reasoning capabilities and answer transparency; and (3) offering a flexible and scalable framework for future improvements in safety management. In both expert evaluations and automatic metrics, CSKR-LLM-HWCEC demonstrated an overall performance improvement of approximately 20%-30% over ChatGPT-4.0 and Qwen, while achieving more than a 50% relative advantage on Rouge and Bleu scores. This study not only advances innovation in the knowledge system of construction safety but also provides intelligent solutions for future safety management and engineering decision-making.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction safety knowledge reasoning; hydropower and water conservancy engineering construction; knowledge graphs; large language model; retrieval-augmented generation
Index terms: performance improvement, relative advantage, evaluation, large language model, construction safety, transparency, decision-making, safety standards, reasoning, safety management
Subjects: decision analysis, professional development, performance measurement, data analysis and analytics, environmental health, occupational health and safety management, innovation studies, cognitive psychology, data science
Topics: Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Health and Safety, Information Management, Quality Management, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here