Pereira, E.; Penner, J. and Ghorab, K. (2026) Integrating energy-based safety with gamified experiential learning for hazard-recognition training. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(8): 04026129, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Hazard recognition remains a critical competency for preventing injuries and fatalities in construction and engineering environments. Yet, traditional safety training often lacks interactivity, contextual realism, and mechanisms to assess readiness before workers enter the jobsite. This study applies energy-based safety (EBS) theory, which conceptualizes hazards as transfers of energy capable of causing harm, to evaluate how a gamified experiential learning environment can strengthen hazard-recognition competency. Thirty engineering students interacted with three energy-based hazard-identification scenarios and completed validated usability and engagement questionnaires, along with retrospective pre-/postlearning items. Five experienced safety professionals participated in qualitative interviews to assess realism, relevance, and potential integration into safety-training programs. Quantitative results showed high usability and engagement, with participants reporting substantial perceived improvements in their understanding of hazardous energy sources and hazard-recognition concepts. Professional feedback confirmed the realism of the scenarios, alignment of energy-based classifications with industry practice, and the environment's potential use for onboarding, recurrent training, and competency development. These findings suggest that integrating EBS with experiential learning principles supports foundational hazard recognition competency and offers a scalable approach to delivering context-rich safety training across organizational and educational settings. Future research should incorporate objective performance metrics, assess long-term retention, and conduct field-based evaluations with industry practitioners.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction safety; energy-based safety; hazard recognition; safety training; serious games |
| Index terms: | safety training, fatalities, interview, usability, retention, energy source, realism, performance metric, injury, questionnaire, practitioner, experiential learning, integration, construction safety, program |
| Subjects: | environmental health, education and knowledge transfer, health conditions and diseases, health risk and incident analysis, performance measurement, data collection methods, practitioner, software systems, user-centered design, learning methods, management, occupational health and safety management, energy systems, organizational analysis |
| Topics: | Human Resources, Sustainability, Education, Organizational Design, Health and Safety, Design Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions, Research Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here