Xin, Z.; Dong, J.; Zeng, H.; Xiong, Z.; Wang, B.; Yan, J. and Wang, Z. (2026) Key parameters and integrated techniques for mechanized tunnel construction via drilling and blasting method. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 152(9): 04026148, ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
As infrastructure development expands into the challenging mountainous regions of western China, tunnel engineering plays a crucial role in transportation infrastructure. This type of construction is characterized by long distances, large cross sections, significant burial depths, and high altitudes. The drilling and blasting method has emerged as the favored option for tunnel engineering projects because of its flexibility and mature technology. The construction machinery has undergone a transformation from manual construction to small-scale mechanical and then to large-scale mechanical construction, and this mechanized approach has been applied in projects such as Dayaoshan Tunnel, Mihualing Tunnel, and Zhengwan Railway. Currently, the parameters for mechanized construction are primarily derived from engineering experience, and there is a paucity of systematized construction methodologies and quantitative analysis of parameters. Therefore, the Qixingping Tunnel was taken as the engineering baseline. By investigating the characteristics and parameters associated with large-scale mechanical operations, the coverage range and key parameter intervals for multimachine construction were analyzed. The influence mechanism of key parameters, such as excavation method and footage, on the mechanical characteristics of the surrounding rock structure was studied. Numerical simulations revealed that increasing the bench length can lead to a reduction in both the extrusion displacement and structural stress at the tunnel face, with reductions of up to 18.6% and 4.5%, respectively. On this basis, the large-scale mechanized construction site tests were conducted and compared with the traditional tunnel construction in terms of construction efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and surrounding rock control. A monthly footage of 110 meters (a 10% increase in efficiency compared to traditional methods) is achieved, and the number of tunnel face workers is reduced by 26. The aim was to furnish theoretical foundations and technical benchmarks for safe and efficient tunnel construction by the drilling and blasting method.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction parameters; drilling and blasting method; influence mechanism; large-scale mechanization; tunnel construction |
| Index terms: | methodology, infrastructure development, extrusion, transformation, drilling, tunnel construction, quantitative analysis, foundations, tunnel, cost-effectivenes, numerical simulation, option, excavation, China, transportation infrastructure, construction site, efficiency, face |
| Subjects: | construction operations, data analysis and analytics, psychology, building construction, modelling and simulation, decision analysis, infrastructure and transport systems, performance management, manufacturing engineering, work location, business, structural engineering, research methods, civil engineering, economics, Geography, infrastructure engineering |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Construction Technology, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Risk Management, Site Management, Geographical Context, Quality Management, Construction Materials, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here